Talk:Eugene de Kock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I don't have much time to work on this, but I can add sources. Granted, it's hard for me to be NPOV about everything here, but I'm actually gobsmacked that there isn't a page on this already. If anyone can help add to it, please do.

ManicParroT 02:11, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's been sourced, and the source is reliable (BBC) so this page is fine. Admittedly, I hadn't heard of him before, but after looking into it a little he is DEFINITELY notable. Perel 02:32, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no matter how awful a person he is, assasin is probably the wrong wording to use —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.119.8.21 (talk) 02:17, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any suggestions? Operative? Agent? ManicParroT (talk) 16:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about just: Eugene de Kock is a former colonel of the South African Police force during Apartheid in South Africa. Dubbed "Prime Evil" by the media, he was the commander of C1 unit (Vlakplaas) of the South African Police counter insurgency group, well known for executing dozens of anti-apartheid activists. With the citation: "The voice of 'Prime Evil'". BBC. October 28, 1998. Isofarro (talk) 19:34, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed "executing" to "killing", which is a neutral (though not ideal) word. Execution is killing following some form of legal process, which these killings were not, as the rest of the article makes clear. The term "extrajudicial assassinations" is also used here, is that better? Babakathy (talk) 10:13, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to go ahead and remove the NPOV tag, since the issues seem to have been addressed. ManicParroT (talk) 10:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Considered one of the darkest figures of the apartheid period" - I rarely find such POV descriptions in Wikipedia. Even Hitler receives a more balanced description. And C1 did not "became a death squad which hunted down and killed opponents of the National Party and the apartheid system". It was a counter-insurgency unit that hunted down terrorists - just like CIA teams that use bombs and drones to kill AL Qaeda members.119.224.91.84 (talk) 06:45, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

To describe de Kock as a "colonel, torturer, and assassin" is not objective, or encyclopaedic language. He was no more a "torturer and assassin" than was Mandela. As for C1 having "hunted down and killed opponents of the National Party and the apartheid system", this is even more emotive and misleading. One could say the same for the CIA. Such emotive and political language should be avoided in Wikipedia.Royalcourtier (talk) 02:14, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eugene de Kock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]