This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Mtemmerm (talk·contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (See this user talk page post.)
The article as written is hardly encyclopedic in tone. Rather, it reads like a promotional brochure for the physician. Further, I note that the edit summaries to date have all included the phrase "Lipov approved", which indicates the article was written at the direction of the article's subject, if not by the subject himself. If the article cannot be rewritted to comply with appropriate policies, including WP:RS, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, and WP:SPIP, it may be nominated for deletion. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 21:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion is not clean up, so nominating it for deletion is not appropriate. However, I agree that it's a bit of a mess. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:35, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wiki should not be used for self-promotion. From his website it is clear that he adores the limelight, and most importantly: he performs experimental procedures which - because he courts the media - is able to sell as revolutionary treatment. His procedure (stellate ganglion block) effectively "reboots" the insular cortex, allowing for a reduction in hot flashes, PTSD - and in his patent description - improve addiction, depression etc etc. The medical community should strongly object to human experimentation and interference with the human brain. While reading his 'patent submission' and articles, it is easy to recognize that he knows very little about the brain function he is tinkering with.
Propaganda should not be allowed on Wiki, esp. not when the self-promotion can mislead and entrap the unsuspecting (naive) public. I recommend his page to be deleted in its entirety. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.110.22.156 (talk) 05:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
