Talk:Eternity's Child

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If someone wants to tackle this one, here's a starting point. JAF1970 23:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS3[edit]

Progrmr@Wrk - can you provide a source to support the Playstation 3 edit? As far as I can tell this game is for Wii and DS only. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.85.206 (talk) 07:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, there aren't any online sources for that detail yet. Regardless, it's true that Luc (the artist and IP owner) has been talking to sony, and we intend to have a PS3 version if at all possible. Prgrmr@wrk 13:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
True though that might be, it's original research and needs sources before being included in an article. Thanks. Tomalak Geret'kal (talk) 21:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More info[edit]

I'm the coder for this game. I have permission from the artist/IP owner (Luc Bernard) to add the picture that I used. If anyone wants to add a different one, any of the four pictures used in this article http://kotaku.com are fair game for cropping and posting here on wiki.

The following are some more articles about the move to the wii. I don't want to violate NPOV by adding any myself, so somebody else please decide what's ok or useful.

[1] [2]

If there are any questions that can help this article, feel free to post them here, or on my user page.

Prgrmr@wrk 14:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, is the Wii version built from scratch, or is it a port of the cancelled XBLA version? Hero of legend 02:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
From scratch, based on a 2d PC engine (C++, opengl). Keep in mind that none of what I just said reflects on the final wii version, only on what we're starting with. Prgrmr@wrk 14:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bias[edit]

People, please keep the bias to a minimum. Mentioning the Destructoid review is of course appropriate but it is NOT the be-all and end-all. It is but one review and is not to be considered "universal" and representative of "reviewers and players alike" unless you can provide citations that say otherwise. Further to that, personal hate against the developer is absolutely unacceptable on Wikipedia. Don't include it in this article. Thanks. Tomalak Geret'kal (talk) 10:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception[edit]

Critical reception is important and must not be arbitrarily removed from this article without at least an explanation in edit summary. As for the "non-notable player article", I think it should be included to keep the article balanced until there are more than just one 'notable' reviews. I have put the section back for the time being. If someone has a valid reason to remove it, please discuss here. Tomalak Geret'kal (talk) 18:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And quit adding unsourced statements with phrases such as "a large majority", "many" and "it has been mentioned". By doing so you are grossly violating WP:OR Tomalak Geret'kal (talk) 21:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@ 69.234.124.47 re «→Reception primary source-ing, and Bernard isn't a "developer", he just did the graphics», he's not even the artist. He just owns the concept of the game. :P Imagine how the people who actually worked on it feel right now. Tomalak Geret'kal (talk) 10:10, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Eternity's Child. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]