Talk:Equine lymphangitis

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Equine Low‑importance

	Horses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Based on UK experience of what might be called "endemic" as opposed to the more severe (and much, much rarer) ulcarative and enzootic lymphangitis. (Dlh-stablelights 15:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Any published evidence for that, 76.1.197.65? Certainly, my clinical experience would suggest that the vast majority of horses make complete recoveries, quite easily. And what's this about "the immune system being weak"? What evidence do you have for this statement? I agree it makes empirical sense, given the location of the infection, but that is true of any infection. I'm afraid I'm going to have to modify that. I'll leave your stuff in - I hadn't really considered that aspect of treatment - but I will try to make it a little more NPOV. Dlh-stablelights 08:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Equine lymphangitis/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Good start, but needs an image (if possible), and expansion of the sections. Also needs more references, especially regarding etiology, which seems like it could be a controversial topic. --Joelmills 01:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 18:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)