Talk:Enhanced motion vehicle

This Additional daughter article -> EMV[edit]

The Enhanced Motion Vehicle should be a candidate for spinning off into an additional article. This would isolate the patent and operational details without spoiling the four articles that would reference it:

Disneywizard (talk) 18:46, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

16-gig[edit]

In the "Audio systems" section: "Sections of track trigger various audio sequences stored onboard 16-gig EEPROM storage..."

This doesn't appear to make sense whether it is gigabits or gigabytes, as I'm not sure why that much storage space would be needed, and it would be physically impractical to provide that much storage via EEPROM chips as conventionally defined.

The claim appears to be unreferenced anyway; the patent that is cited elsewhere in the article mentions computer memory in general and EEPROMs in particular, but it does not address the question of storage capacity. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 19:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't clear whether the editor meant 16 gigabit (2 gigabyte) or 16 gigabyte. I have some personal expertise with the subject and given the short amount of audio used for a 5-minute ride, I wouldn't expect more than 30 minutes of audio to be stored in a multitrack format for this application. I'd think the former (16 gigabits) makes more sense. 16 gigabytes would be overkill for such an application. Perhaps, is this cited in the patent for the EMV?FA Jon (talk) 05:41, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Enhanced motion vehicle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160109041546/http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=5623878 to http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=5623878

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:04, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]