This article is part of WikiProject Paraguay, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Paraguay. If you would like to participate, you can improve Elizardo Aquino, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ParaguayWikipedia:WikiProject ParaguayTemplate:WikiProject ParaguayParaguay articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
@Nat965, GraemeLeggett, and Mathglot: -- I have noticed your recent edit on this talkpage. I feel you should revert the action as to removing those two spaces from the WikiProjectBanner section as it was not like that with my edit. Secondly, revert your movement of the "living" in the Biography WikiProject since the "living" is always before the assessment. I'm asking this because I, too, was in a similar trouble for doing something similar on talkpages which you can read on my talkpage. Adamdaley (talk) 08:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Adamdaley:, just to be clear, you are talking about this edit by Nat of 20:44, 22 October. I don't agree that there is anything wrong with this edit, and it doesn't need to be reverted. This was already explained at your Talk page, mostly by Graeme, in this discussion. I don't disagree with you that the re-ordering of |class= and |living= was unnecessary, but Nat also added the Paraguay ratings at the same time. Your edits have not been at issue, even when they included such reordering, as long as there was some other improvement involved. As far as removing blanks, I don't see it. Mathglot (talk) 19:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, Adam, one other thing: a word of support for you: this was the right place to raise an issue like this about content, along with your argumentation of why you believe it to be so, so thanks for that. I'm just one editor; it's possible others will show up and agree with you, who knows. I just wanted to say that, because though my message above disagreed with you on the merits, that's just my opinion, and I wanted to be clear that you're following the procedures correctly about discussion, and that's a good thing. Mathglot (talk) 20:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
