Talk:Ed Sullivan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Year of birth?[edit]

I started looking into this after someone posted a question about it on WP:RD/H. There are several reputable sources claiming he was born in 1901(NY Times obituary; Television Heaven; Encarta) and also several reputable sources claming he was born in 1902 (IMDB; Biography.com; NY Times). Anyone have any insight into which is correct? Chuck 21:51, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As per the New York City Birth Index 1891-1902, Birth certificate #38725 shows that Edward Sullivan was born 28 Sep 1901. To be absolutely sure you'd have to see the original. - Nunh-huh 07:41, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Red Scare[edit]

I recall reading somewhere that Sullivan was in the habit of "outing" suspected communists in his column during the '50s, yet I see no mention of this rather distasteful aspect of his life and work in the article. Can somebody look into this issue? (24.114.255.83 01:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Favourable?[edit]

To be honest the tone of this article isn't really fitting for an encoclyopeadic entry, it tends to grant Sullivan the benefit of the doubt in a few cases and ommitts certain unsavoury details such as those mentioned above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.10.97.187 (talk) 02:11, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, because it's absolutely essential to evaluate everyone from the past, in this case, the 1950s (over 60 years ago, mind you), by the standards of the 2000s. So, what will they say about YOU fifty years from now, under standards about which we have absolutely no way to predict?

Cleanup[edit]

Ed Sullivan is notable and a major icon of American culture. So I think the article deserves attention make it a first rate entry. I'll start off with some of my observations.

The section names are confusing to me. For example, "Personality" seems to list the acts that were banned from the Ed Sullivan Show. Should the section should be named "Banned Acts"? If the section instead is about Sullivan's personality in general, then I would expect to read about other elements of it - a positive side, his relationship with people off stage, etc.

Also, his show had a multi-decade run. Did his show have more banned acts than one would expect? Did Sullivan himself call for the bans? In some of the cases, an artist did another song than what they had agreed to perform. I would expect artists to get in trouble for this! (See, for instance, Elvis Costello who switched songs on Saturday Night Live).

The article also makes some claims about Sullivan that should either be supported with cites, put in context, or flagged as possible original research or examples of a non-neutral point of view. For instance: "Somehow, Sullivan still seemed to fit the show; he appeared to the audience as an average guy ..." and "He had a knack for identifying and promoting top talent and paid a great deal of money to secure that talent for his show."

Also, the article suffers from poor organization. The obituary section ("Death") mentions his star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame - that seems more like something for either the introduction or a section on awards. The same section also mentions his daughter and then adds "Sullivan was in the habit of calling Sylvia after every program to get her immediate critique." That might go into "Personality" or a section on his relationship with his family.

Normally, in an article with issues like the ones I've raised, I'd be bold, move around text, and delete or flag problem areas, but I feel that there are enough individual issues that it would be good to hear from others about how this article can be improved. --Zippy (talk) 09:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The most-obvious issue is that much of it belongs in Ed Sullivan Show, not here. Keep the parts that discuss Sullivan specifically (such as his wooden stage manner), but most of it needs to move (or be deleted for redundancy, as in the cases of the banned acts). YLee (talk) 09:59, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More about Elvis[edit]

It might be worth mentioning that Sullivan attempted to clean up Elvis by putting him in a tuxedo and removing his wiggling hips from camera range. 71.233.142.108 (talk) 13:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flipped picture[edit]

It seems that the picture of Mr. Sullivan is flipped. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.69.169.144 (talk) 17:41, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Death[edit]

I just heard that Ed Sullivan has died. Perhaps the article should be updated? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.117.103.145 (talk) 02:29, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Education[edit]

According to the article, Sullivan moved from boxer to sports writer to gossip columnist to television host. How much education did he have? These days it's hard to become a professional writer without any college, but some have done so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dynzmoar (talk • contribs) 15:56, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

health after boxing career[edit]

Doesn't it seem rather quite likely that the description of Sullivan as being block-headed, dull, and with eyes that bulge or recess &c., and his later descent into the mental fog of Alzheimer's disease, are both the result of the repeated punches to his head that he recieved as a boxer in his youth?

Should this be written into the article, or ought it not be included because it is original research? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.171.239 (talk) 06:25, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rolling Stones info is false[edit]

The Rolling Stones appeared on the Sullivan show six times total. Their last appearance was late 1969---the Stones were superstars at this point and Ed Sullivan actually walked to Mick Jagger and shook his hand---the Sullivan Show was cancelled a year and a half later. The Stones were never banned by the show. Mick Jagger appeared on their first show (1964) without a jacket and it is true that Sullivan was annoyed but he was still allowed to appear without a jacket on the air. The Stones second appearance---the group complied---all wore jackets. The Nazi uniform thing is an urban legend--never happened. Despite their rebel image---the Stones were interested in making music and selling records and Sullivan had a huge audience.

Rolling Stones 1967 and 1969 appearances[edit]

The Rolling Stones appeared on the Sullivan show six times total, with the last two times being the mentioned January 15, 1967 performance where the lyrics to 'Let's Spend the Night Together' where altered, and the appearance of November 18, 1969. They did not appear on the show between these two days. The reference given is false. See: http://www.nzentgraf.de/books/tcw/works1.htm

There is nothing on the link you cited (a list of books and fanzines) that supports your version of events. You have to cite a specific page in a specific reliable source. Please don't revert again unless you can do that. I will check the cited Sullivan biography tonight (the book is at home), and if the citation is incorrect I will change it. It's a small point, and you could be right, but we can't just take your word for it. DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 14:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've checked both the cited source and an additional one, and @Heteren: is correct, so I've made the change and cited the additional source material. DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 15:54, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ed Sullivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ed Sullivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ed Sullivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ed Sullivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid citation removed[edit]

I removed a citation to https://www.harlemworldmagazine.com/ed-sullivan-on-the-ed-sullivan-show-1970s/ . The article there is dated July 3, 2017. However, looking at the version of this Wikipedia article immediately prior to then ([1]), it's apparent that the Harlem World Magazine article got its content from Wikipedia. Hence, it would be circular referencing to cite that article, and it should not be used. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anklyosing spondylitis[edit]

Some references say that Ed Sullivan's unusual posture was caused by Anklyosing Spondylitis. I do not know if any reliable sources say this.Createangelos (talk) 12:16, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

I've improved the reference formatting on the article. I've also completed incomplete information, improved the quality of references (e.g. adding page numbers and convenience links), and rm inappropriate refs.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 20:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

'Big shew' factual error[edit]

Article says Sullivan never once said the phrase "really big shew" (with that pronunciation) in any episode of the show. First, that would need a citation as such an absolute statement would require an examination of every single episode, which is impossible as many have been lost. And it's easily disproven by this video in which he does it while introducing Elvis; granted, he is intentionally poking fun at the impressionists, but the fact remains he did use "shew" at least once on the air. 23skidoo (talk) 23:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wife if she was 83 in 2014 at her death should would have been born in 1931??? They married in 1930 so there must be an error in the dates[edit]

This dates for the marriage and the Ed’s wife don’t add up. They were married in 1930, yet it list her age at her death in 2914 as 83 which would means she was born in 1931 a year after their marriage. Also if Ed was born in 1901 he would have been 30 years older than his wife. He died in 1974 at 73 and his wife died at 83 40 years later. There has to be a mistake. 70.44.173.22 (talk) 00:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Sullivan's daughter Betty was the person who died in 2014, when she was 83 years old. If you read the information box you'll see that his wife Sylvia died in 1973. ~~~~ Karenthewriter (talk) 03:33, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ed_Sullivan&oldid=1194729521"