Talk:East Hoathly with Halland

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sussex Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The original article confused the parish name with the village name: two separate places Peter Shearan 09:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Costumes[edit]

Doesn't East Hoathly bonfire society generally only do the Cowboy's and Indians theme?

When I lived there in the 80s/90s each of the surrounding village’s societies had a different theme. I can't remember who the Vikings or Military themed societies were though.

217.154.74.244 14:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite of article[edit]

The article here sets out the Wikipedia notes on writing about settlements. It specifies headings (although, with smaller places like this, they can be adjusted), and makes it clear that all and any statements are backed by a reference. Hence the rewrite. The article now talks about the civil parish as a whole, specifying where possible which part of the parish. This too is specified in the notes: that a civil parish article should incorporate its component parts within it; this reduces the need for having separate article about the smallest of places - and with it, the number of stubs.

Incidentally, I note that the fireworks disaster actually occurred in the neighbouring parish of Ringmer, which is West Sussex (see reference 10)although the media called it Halland. Peter Shearan (talk) 09:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on East Hoathly with Halland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071210205603/http://www.villagenet.co.uk/sevensisters/villages/halland.php to http://www.villagenet.co.uk/sevensisters/villages/halland.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]