Talk:E. J. H. Corner

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about a botanist or someone who contributed to the field of botany

Fungi Low‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notorious among whom?[edit]

Surely Corner has not gained notoriety among creationists for that partial quotation when it seems to favour their stance? It would be among scientists where any percieved notoriety might lie whereas within creationist circles Corner's name and partial statement would be clasped to the collective bosom as glady as any supportive biblical passage. Chrysippo (talk) 09:27, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is his work still considered accurate?[edit]

I came here because I'm reading his Life of Plants, and it was written in the sixties, and I'm wondering how much of its content is consistent with contemporary knowledge, and how much has been disproven. It would be useful to have a section that discusses how well his work holds up. 72.1.195.4 (talk) 16:47, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]