Talk:Dutchman (play)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Comment[edit]
The last paragraph of the 'Plot' section seems to be mostly interpretation. That should be moved to a separate category, maybe. Or maybe it should be removed entirely, seeing as how it appears to be independent ideas and research.
The article specifies that the train passengers are white, Baraka specifies in his stage directions that the riders are both black and white. I've fixed this in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.194.151.220 (talk) 05:32, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- The "Plot" section contains considerable analysis, not just in the last paragraph. Somebody familiar with the secondary literature should create an "Analysis" section and separate the plot summary from the analysis. It would also be worthwhile adding sections on the play's production history and critical reception. J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 18:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dutchman (play). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090504101347/http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/baraka.htm to http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/baraka.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)