Talk:Downtown Redmond station

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Trains: Stations / Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Cost performance[edit]

I realize that the cost of this segemnt has been controversial and tried to put in independently verified facts as neutrally and unadorned as as possible. Perhaps they belong in the East Link article instead of, or additionally to, here. - Brianhe (talk) 13:50, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would include it in the East Link article (which I plan to eventually get around to expanding, seeing as it is not likely to be merged after completion like the others), and directly cite Fremark's piece rather than The Urbanist (which treads the line of a SPS). It could be compared there with a similar analysis for the rest of East Link, if one can be found (likely, given all the controversy around the project). Sounder Bruce 20:00, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

Hello! I think an Infobox needs to be added. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Username Goes Here 062805 (talk • contribs) 01:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]