Talk:Douchebag

Small edit

In the page source, there are two locks:

{{pp-protected|small=yes}}{{pp-move|small=yes}}

The pp-move one should be removed since the page is fully protected anyway, and the move one is not visible. ~ihaveamac [talk|contribs] 21:01, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

It isn't for now, but will be on January 1st, 2015. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:11, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Not done: The move lock isn't visible on the page, so there's no need to remove it, plus with the code this way things will work automatically come 2015. (And you can always remove the pp-protected template yourself then.) — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 04:58, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

It's also possible to have a page fully edit-protected, whilst being semi-prot for moves (or even not move-prot at all). --Redrose64 (talk) 18:32, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

The meaning for this hilarious word is a Baraa. 90.216.193.132 (talk) 17:10, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Requested move 15 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: withdrawn (non-admin closure). SSTflyer 08:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

---

Douchebag → Douchebag (disambiguation) – The primary topic for "douchebag" is Douche, or its slang use, which is covered in the Douche article. Douchebag should redirect to Douche. Alternatively, this disambiguation page may be deleted per WP:TWODABS, with a hatnote pointing to Douchebag (film) at the Douchebag article. SSTflyer 14:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose as the current 3-item disambig seems to be more appropriate than a primarytopic grab. Dicklyon (talk) 15:00, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
  • The first two items both link to the Douche article. SSTflyer 15:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose no benefit to readers. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose I'm pretty certain that the primary topic for douchebag is the slang term, and there is no data that the Nom has suggested that supports his claim that the PT is Douche.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  02:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

why is Douchebag fully protected rather than semi

For what reason is the article Douchebag full-protected instead of semi-protected? Angela Maureen (talk) 17:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

@September 1988: Have a look at the edit history, particularly the edits before the impositition of each prot. Or have a look at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive867#Appeal of RFPP decline for Douchebag. Or at the editnotice for this talk page. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

https://theoatmeal.com/comics/tesla is the reason for all of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.39.175.199 (talk) 05:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

IPA useful?

It would be /ˈduːʃˌbæɡ/ --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)