Talk:Dino

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

On 24 November 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Dino (disambiguation) to Dino. The result of the discussion was moved, as well as original "Dino" to Dino (name).

Requested move 24 November 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: both pages moved (non-admin closure). — Coolperson177 (t|c) 03:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dino (disambiguation) → Dino
Dino → Dino (name)

– No WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for Dino in terms of page views or long-term significance. Conjecture, but all of my local search views and news articles when I search "Dino" shows results for dinosaurs. Several other pages beat the name in page views, stats [here] Ortizesp (talk) 16:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Dino is clearly abbr name of Dinosaurs, and is clearly primary redirect. 180.254.173.167 (talk) 20:04, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Right now it's not redirecting to Dinosaur, so are you proposing to redirect it there? Either way it would have to be moved.--Ortizesp (talk) 20:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Maybe yes, since Dino already referred to Dinosaurs to general people. So i would prefer move the redirect Dino to Dinosaur. 180.254.173.167 (talk) 23:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Dinosaur per 180.254.173.167. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 02:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support the character gets 2,288 views and the automobile gets 2,256 compared with only 956 for the name. The name may be primary by long-term significance but dinosaurs may also be so I'd have no primary topic as I don't think dinosaur are called "Dino" often enough for a primary topic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:46, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dinosaur is the most common usage (i.e. what "first comes to mind" to English speakers), but the name is more encyclopedic since "dino" is a very informal epithet. Therefore there is no primary topic. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support both per nom, and per reasons listed by User:King of Hearts. Paintspot Infez (talk) 05:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Dino is commonly used to mean many things, and I think there would probably be a fairly even split between those who would expect it to be a name (I certainly would), and those who would expect it to be a short form of "dinosaur" (which seems quite logical when I think about it). HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 21:08, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination; Crouch, Swale; King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠; Paintspot Infez and HumanBodyPiloter5. WP:NOPRIMARYTOPIC. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 02:39, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support no primary topic; however I oppose having Dino redirect to Dinosaur. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 18:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.