Talk:Design and Technology Academy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Added information[edit]

Added the information for the freshman and sophomore classes...Lanceypants

Indeed...although, honestly, I think it should just be one big freshman bashing page. But nobody seems to care about my opinion as it is. Oh, and to the person who will be coming to DATA for 2007-2008, be prepared to hate computers by the end of the year.

I see that this page has gotten some content added to it. :D

It needs a Legends of DATA section. I think I will add that. CaptainWeasel 18:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page needs a lot of work! --ELiTe185 16:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed! BTW, im a K-SAT student, going to DATA in 2007-2008

I'm a sophomore in DATA. What should I add?

This page needs a section about the difrent kinds of students at the school. like the difrent kinds of nerds.

Sorry, but every high school has it's own set of nerds and sub-cultures, hence the widespread use of the word "cliques". Anywho, time to add my opinions (take 'em or leave 'em):

    -1. It's great that Kruger is listed as a "See also" link, but besides the fact that they're another magnet program in the NEISD area, it doesn't have any relevance to DATA. Yeah I know quite a few kids pour into DATA from there. Leave it there, I'm just saying it's kinda pushing the envelope.
    -2. LIST COURSES. For god sake, we're issued a course list book every year! Hell I'm sure Fitzsimon would have no problem printing out this info for you at a moment's notice (though ask later in the year, she's still swamped with schedule changes)!
    -3. There are no legends of DATA. End of story.
    -4. Just generically more info. We range from electronic engineering to publication graphics to programming, someone get off there ass and expand! I will as soon as a design layout has been made (I'm talking about Category titles and subjects). Another thing that could be useful is a little info about how we merge with Roosevelt HS and share their classes, along with (dear lord...) a PICTURE OF DATA. A logo's great, but add a picture of the building for crying out loud, we have our own freakin entrance and hallways!

Anywho, I'll try to come up with a category layout real quick and attempt to find the inner wiki-editor inside me (this might take a while...) to post them up. If you've got info on a class POST IT, even if it's worded like shit, someone will become bored enough to re-word it eventually. LazyMegaMan 23:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...I forgot to save that last post, so these time stamps are gonna look a bit weird...Anyways, I added course categories. Fill 'em out to the best of your abilities and knowledge, but dear lord don't write a novel! Just some general info. DON'T spam/complain about Pecina under GOOP or OOP, just...don't. Also I'm not sure how the teachers would like having their names posted on a high-traffic website, so I didn't put any names.LazyMegaMan 23:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Data-banner.GIF[edit]

Image:Data-banner.GIF is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can't we do better?[edit]

Can't we do better on this page? I'm marking it for expansion. ELiTe185 (talk) 05:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or rather, since it is already marked for expansion, I'm also marking it as a Texas School Stub, because I believe it meets the requirements for a stub ELiTe185 (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]