Talk:Defraggler

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

{{Reqphoto}}[edit]

Completed. 02:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Primary sources removal[edit]

The primary sources that were included in the article were for a feature set and version information. The feature set source may have had a bit of market-speak, but I didn't list any of that in the article. The version information source is just a link to the changelog for the program to list a few changes that have been made from previous versions (not something that would be inherently biased). Regardless, the article now has non-primary sources, so I removed the template. HoCkEy PUCK (talk) 18:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Features section?[edit]

Perhaps rather than listing the features in the introduction paragraph, it might be better to move that information to its own section. HoCkEy PUCK (talk) 19:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anish9807 _t _c 09:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lead statement[edit]

". . .which notably allows users to defragment individual files on their computer system."

This seems to imply that the program also does other things, but that they aren't notable. I removed the word "notable". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wordreader (talk • contribs) 00:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC) [sorry I forgot to tilde >_< ][reply]

Cost, pros & cons[edit]

According to this PC World page: http://www.pcworld.com/downloads/file/fid,72958/description.html , this program isn't totally "free", but is "donationware", meaning it's free to try, but then you are expected to give the author a donation.

Although the editorial review is good, the user comments offer some negative experiences, for balance. Yours, Wordreader (talk) 02:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]