Talk:De Virga world map

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Maps Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article had an importance automatically assigned to it. Once it has been checked by a human, please remove `\|autoi=yes`.

[Untitled][edit]

With the exception of the last paragraph, the region section makes no sense, has no citations, and is purely conjecture. PHG was right to delete it, and I will do the same. Zeus1234 17:48, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uncritical description[edit]

The description seems to go much beyond what Henry Davis writes (I have no opinion on whether he is a WP:RS). The second source, the 1421 page, is certainly not a reliable source. We need a more neutral description. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 16:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to be cut to what we can verify from RS. See this also [1]. Dougweller (talk) 18:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]