Talk:Dazzler (weapon)

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Theres this "flashlight" that might be considered a dazzler[edit]

While technically a flashlight, Surefire makes a 200 lumen device called an LX2 LumaMax. I nearly blew my eyes out with it, it would make a nasty weapon. Maybe include that here, I don't know, what does Wikipedia think? 65.188.243.101 (talk) 03:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Countermeasures - stick out a hand ![edit]

Dazzler_(weapon)#Countermeasures - should we add

"A simple countermeasure would be a hand at arms-length, interposed between the source and the eyes"

I use this cycling at night against car headlights. Incoming visible laser beams would be visible during targetting. Does Wikipedia have a policy about not "stating the bleeding obvious" ? Surprisingly the article says " Dazzlers emit invisible light against sensors, and visible light against humans" ! --195.137.93.171 (talk) 20:45, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dazzler (weapon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dazzler (weapon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.testdept.org.uk/PPP-9.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aeronautics.ru/nws001/abl/abl011.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070117212639/http://www.icltd.org/laser_weapons.htm to http://www.icltd.org/laser_weapons.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/nlw/research_reports/docs/BNLWRP_OP1_Dec06.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saber 203 dazzler[edit]

The Saber 203 dazzler section is incorrect. While the Saber 203 dazzler does go into the M203 grenade launcher it is NOT a munition. It is NOT launched. It is used and activated while it is in the M203 grenade launcher. How could a laser be used and aimed while in flight??? 69.141.198.76 (talk) 17:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]