Talk:Damian Drum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I don't think that this person is notable enough to have such a long article to them. So I am going to delete bits of it.  :)--harrismw 06:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you think the person is not notable, then nominate it for deletion. There's not a chance in hell it would get anything but a strong consensus to keep. With this in mind, please do not remove perfectly relevant facts from the article, as this could well be considered vandalism. Ambi 06:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I said that he wasn't notable enough to have such a long article, I wasn't wanting to delete it. There is also POV which I have removed, while leaving your precious facts intact.
I also don't think that his nephew needs to be mentioned in the article.
Wikipedia is meant as a collaborative effort to make articles better, I felt that my changes were making the article better, would you have reverted them if I didn't say anything in the talk page? harrismw 03:32, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. You removed perfectly pertinent information, and I'm not convinced that any of the text you removed was POV material at all. Ambi 03:41, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So let me explain it then. (And please do not continue to revert all the time, it is annoying.)
renowned - who says so? I don't think he is renowned, so having that there is POV.
devastating - dito. It wasn't devastating for the team that won was it?
major - in this context is a tautology landslide implies big lose, no need for major.
So please respond, and also respond to my question on the nephew. harrismw 03:50, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i love this man

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Damian Drum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]