Talk:D Sports Racing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports Car Racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sports Car Racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sports Car RacingWikipedia:WikiProject Sports Car RacingTemplate:WikiProject Sports Car RacingSports Car Racing articles

Motorsport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scott Tucker's campaign probably warrants its own section[edit]

He threw so much money at the program that his car could hang with LMP2s. And he's a crook who used his money to, among other things, dominate the class. Seems notable.96.240.128.124 (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 October 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus - no move. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

D Sports Racing → Prototype 2 (racing class) – The class/car has not been referred to as 'D Sports Racing' ever and has not been to 'D Sports Racer' since 2013. It is currently known since Prototype 2 and the article should be updated to reflect that. Grahaml35 (talk) 13:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 22:52, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it's better if it's SCCA Prototype 2 class or SCCA Prototype 2;; there are many items with coverage on Wikipedia that are second prototypes that are called prototype 2. -- 65.92.244.127 (talk) 09:39, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.