Talk:Dépeçage
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Difference of Law in Federalist Systems[edit]
In Federalist systems, such as the United States or Australia, dépeçage is necessary when arbitrating or adjudicating tort cases which might be governed by multiple jurisdictions, and the choice of one's jurisdiction does not necessarily decide the applicable law. For example, in 2018 the Stormy Daniels v Donald Trump case involved a choice between Texas law and New York law. See also Tobinick v. Novella, 108 F. Supp. 3d 1299 (S.D.F.L. 2015). A larger descripton of the process is available from Marc Randazza, civil rights lawyer and Presient of 1st Amendment Association, https://web.archive.org/web/20181211060608/https://www.popehat.com/2018/04/30/randazza-stormy-v-trump-anti-slapp-thru-depecage-motherfucker/ --38.145.144.111 (talk) 01:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)