Talk:Cystic fibrosis–related diabetes

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cystic fibrosis–related diabetes.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

On 24 July 2020, it was proposed that this article be moved from Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes to Cystic fibrosis–related diabetes. The result of the discussion was moved.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2019 and 13 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jansenja.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

stub made[edit]

created. Pulmonological (talk) 22:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

creon 2A02:C7C:E227:8500:F911:70E3:E78:9BA7 (talk) 18:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

I have put references before the period and had a bot change them all to after, and then I have seen a bot move them all back to before - both in the name of proper formatting. How should I be doing my references in relation to the period? :P Pulmonological (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a bot; it was Chris857 (talk · contribs). Presumably s/he prefers to have ref tags appear after punctuation. (you could ask him on his user talk page.) Post-punctuation is by far the most common approach for ref tags, so perhaps it seems "correct" to most editors now. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification! | pulmonological ^{talk • contribs} 01:10, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

it hink taht all children should be vital 2A02:C7C:E227:8500:F911:70E3:E78:9BA7 (talk) 18:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Breast cancer-related regulator of tp53 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:03, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]