Talk:Cyclones BOB 03 and Yemyin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Todo[edit]

I just copied and pasted the storm section over to a new article. There was sufficient information in the article, and such a deadly storm deserves an article. Some updated information would be needed. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:58, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't quite see how this is high-impt, so lowered to mid. Chacor 04:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Potentially over 1000 deaths is worthy of high impt, to me. Hurricanehink (talk) 12:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note to put into article[edit]

please read this link and consider mentioning information provided in the article-

http://www.weatherunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=702&tstamp=200706&theprefset=BLOGCOMMENTS&theprefvalue=0 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.62.10 (talk) 23:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Naming[edit]

The IMD has retroactively named the system Yemyin, so I moved the article to Cyclone Yemyin and updated some references, the lede, and the naming section. However, dealing with storm history might be a little tricky because we don't have best track information on the system. --Coredesat 06:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can we not use the Operational Advisories to Create the Rough Track as there seems to be enough Data there to plot the track ??? Jason Rees 20:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We would use JTWC best track for that as IMD does not have best track data available. We would need the IMD best track for timing purposes (when'd it become a cyclonic storm, for instance). --Coredesat 22:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture[edit]

I am keeping this photo here..HunterZone (talk) 13:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 23 external links on Cyclone Yemyin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan deaths[edit]

There are numbers of 113 and "over 80" listed in the article, and I can't find a source for either. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 09:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]