Talk:Cultural references to Hamlet

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 April 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Shakespeare Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Popular Culture Start‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular Culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular CultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular CulturePopular Culture articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Film/Television[edit]

Sons of Anarchy should be on this list, as should Legend of the Black Scorpion, yes? --72.23.28.29 (talk) 16:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC) Tom[reply]

I don't know anything about Sons of Anarchy, but I agree with you that The Banquet should be on here. I don't understand why you've called it "Legend of the Black Scorpion", though. Is that an alternative title? AndyJones (talk) 19:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Lion King[edit]

Seeing as there are many references to Hamlet in The Lion King (I can think of at least ten offhand, and I know of several places these can be verified), what do people think of me starting a separate page listing these intertextual references? --TimothyJacobson (talk) 02:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup welcome[edit]

I'm going to start a major clean-up of this page, as some references are in the wrong category, a lot of citations are needed and several sentences look frankly amateur. Any help with clean up would be much appreciated --TimothyJacobson (talk) 02:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TimothyJacobson, Xover, it took awhile but it is done, reasonably. So what's next...Oh hell, no!! Maybe next year. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hamlet in popular culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090908041936/http://www.undeadflick.com/ to http://www.undeadflick.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ordering in sections[edit]

I prefer chronological, anyone mind if I make this change? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:58, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]