Talk:Constance of Sicily, Queen of Aragon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 February 2021 and 30 March 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Funnysagittarius.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Constance II?[edit]

The Spanish Wikipedia calls her Constanza II de Sicilia. Is it possible that she was Peter I's co-monarch as Constance II? I've noticed that some books do indeed call her Constance II. The Spy Who Came in from the Cold (talk) 10:21, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 01 September 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. The consensus is that the current title is the most common name in English-language reliable sources. Jenks24 (talk) 07:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Constance of Sicily, Queen of AragonConstance II of Sicily – Name is used more frequently among Italian and Spanish historians. –
Darius von Whaleyland, Great Khan of the Barbarian Horde 09:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 01:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Steel1943 (talk) 13:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: For "proof of contesting", see here. Steel1943 (talk) 13:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is entirely possible that Constance did function as queen regnant in some sense. Perhaps she should be called Constance II. But we need a proper discussion, one that would include sources discussing her status. Wikipedia definitely cannot be its own source. The Italian Wikipedia cites "Runciman, p. 55", but nothing there confirms the claim made in the article. I am still trying to access "Pierotti Cei, p.214". Surtsicna (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.