Talk:Confidentiality/Archive 1

Archive 1

This article is also lacking on Counseling Confidentiality

Not just in victim/counselor relationships, but any form of counseling, such as where the client(s) seeing a counselor for relationship counseling, marriage counseling, etc.

In this regard, where does the line get drawn? Do courts get to admiss any information divulged without the client's consent? This is particularly curious in the case where there are two clients, and one client divulges in information that breaks confidentiality, such as might be seen in custody battles.

No reference for "Clinical Psychology" paragraph

The story about Nurse Whitman and Amy Miller has no referece and nothing about this can be found anywhere on the web except in Wiki and in some mirror websites. Looks a little suspicious... At least give some reference! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.77.4.129 (talk) 21:00, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed merge with HIV confidentiality

As I understand it there are no special rules for HIV confidentiality. HIV is covered by the same confidentiality regulations as other health issues. That means that "HIV confidentiality" doesn't meet the general notability criteria. The concept of confidentiality for HIV patients is better covered within the concept of medical confidentiality. Sjö (talk) 17:24, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Confidentiality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20090429230410/http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/aborlaws.htm to http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/aborlaws.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Citation added for the first section

For the first paragraph under the "Legal confidentiality" section, I added an appropriate citation for the claim made. HanMiKC (talk) 15:40, 23 October 2020 (UTC)