Talk:Commercial Utility Cargo Vehicle

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Canadian / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Chevrolet Silverado#First generation Silverado / Second generation Sierra (1999–2007)|Chevrolet Silverado 1500]] The anchor (#First generation Silverado / Second generation Sierra (1999–2007)) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Chevrolet Silverado#Heavy duty|Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD]] The anchor (#Heavy duty) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Chevrolet Tahoe#1992–1999 (GMT400)|Tahoe]] The anchor (#1992–1999 (GMT400)) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Chevrolet Tahoe#2001-2006|Chevrolet Tahoe]] The anchor (#2001-2006) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Chevrolet C/K#Fourth generation (1988–2002)|Chevrolet C/K]] The anchor (Fourth generation (1988–2002)) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

4.88:1 gears on M1028a2/M1028a3[edit]

As much as I want to see 4.88's in these trucks I'm reading nothing that points to 4.88's in the duallys. Perhaps the best evidence that they were regular 4.56 gears is that these duallys were converted by the Marines? and started off life w/ 14b SRW, just like the rest. The conversion kits came with Dana 70 HD axles, but don't have anything to convert the front axle to 4.88's.--Dana60Cummins (talk) 18:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Broken front suspension[edit]

Did anyone notice the right front suspension on the Dodge has something very wrong? Look at how the wheel is leaning way in at the top. Bizzybody (talk) 07:46, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's the only picture we got.--Dana60Cummins (talk) 20:16, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can try to hunt one down on Commons, but no promises.

Tschau, Dwightol102 (talk) 01:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys[edit]

Who wants to create a Dodge_m880 page? I've recently become quite interested in these old military hunks. And, I can get you a different picture if you want.Coding for Christ (talk) 16:02, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think a m880 page is needed. It's covered well here already. Unless you or someone else has tons of info that it starts dwarfing the GM CUCV section. I'd just keep it where it is. And yes I agree with you that M880 are some really nice underrated trucks.--Dana60Cummins (talk) 16:12, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"M880 CUCV"?[edit]

NO ONE ever called the M880 family "CUCVs."

The CUCV term was created in the '80s when the GM trucks were purchased.

Everyone called the Dodge pickups "880s." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.184.204 (talk) 07:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit it then. --Dana60Cummins (talk) 16:52, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I was stationed at Fort Lewis from 1978-1980 and regularly checked out an 880 from the motor pool that was referred to as a CUTV, although I suppose now I just misunderstood the enunciation since there doesn't appear to be such a thing as a CUTV. But I got out in June of 1980 and the term was in use prior to that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.67.42.206 (talk) 04:16, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was stationed at Fort Bragg in from 1980 until 1986 and we went thru the transition from Jeeps and Dodges to Blazers and GM pickups, as they were replaced as they were delivered, which was a few at a time after the first batch, we had all four until around 1985 when the last 151s were removed and cut in half. When I left for Korea there were still 880's serving along side the GM's and both were referred to as CUCV's, i.e. Dodge CUCV and Chevy CUCV. When I arrived in Korea we still had Gamma Goats and 880's serving alongside the newer GMs. When I left in 88 it was still the same although the Gamma Goats had been "parked" for some time by then. Again both pickups were referred to as CUCV's. When I arrived at Ft Hood the only 151s and Dodges still in use were by Air Force ALO teams and Range Control. When I went to the Gulf War some units still had 880's, which mostly came from Pomcus stocks in the UK and Germany. Those were all given to the SANG when those units left.100.34.84.108 (talk) 13:56, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edits[edit]

I've done some significant editing of this page lately. When I found myself here after doing some research on the Bradley Fighting Vehicle I was horrified. I think it's pretty well cleaned up now, with a better information, better layout, infoboxes, and plenty of images (except the CUCV II. Still need a few for it. Anybody have any?). The references are still lacking, but there really isn't much info around about these trucks. I also wish I could find a list of operators for each incarnation, but that probably won't happen. Cheers --Stratocaster27^t@lk 05:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I went back and added many inline citations and references. Still need CUCV II photos. --Stratocaster27^t@lk 16:40, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Someone needs to correct the torque rating of the Chevy 6.2 diesel engine. No way is 240 foot pounds correct for a diesel of this size. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michou 13 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yer Armored Combat CUCV...[edit]

This article suffers, like the HMMWV piece, from a common thread of presentism, in that it's assumed that light tactical trucks go around with unlight tactical armor, and that this somehow differentiates the 1009 and the 880 series from the HMMV. Back when I was a serving' o' the Raygun, every light truck, including the HMMWV, was generally unarmored. The article should reflect that reality. Thoughts? Anmccaff (talk) 04:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An armored version of the Dodge 880 existed called the Peacekeeper, it was built by Cadillac-Gage. PaPiker (talk) 02:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Commercial Utility Cargo Vehicle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051217124115/http://www.gmfleet.com/gmfleetjsp/government/product/military.jsp to http://www.gmfleet.com/gmfleetjsp/government/product/military.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]