Talk:Columbia City Paper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability[edit]

I beleive a discussion is in order for notability of this newspaper.

  1. One reference and three external links point to its own website. This does not provide notability.
  2. Another external link provides verification that an employee resigned when his home was allegedly the subject of an arson attempt.

Neither of these provides notability of the paper itself. For that, the paper would need references in secondary sources. These might include: (1) has the paper received any awards from established industry organizations?, (2) has the paper been recognized regionally or nationally for a story or editorial and the impact it had on the local community? Anything really other than it exists. If the only the article has to say is that the paper exists, then someone should combine it with other stubs of SC newspapers. - PennySpender1983 (talk) 02:14, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete discussion topics. They stand as a record for editors who want to know how the article developed. Topics are discussed to reach concensus and then adopted into the article. - PennySpender1983 (talk) 23:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, on August 11, 2008 the above mentioned tag was removed by an anonomous user (66.57.189.219 ) who also deleted the discussion topics mentioned here.
The assertion by the editor appears to be that the information he/she added is sufficient to meet the criteria of the Wikipedia guidelines on notability. Quite a few links were added to the reference section, but only one additional piece of information was added to the text of the article.
I will take a look at the information added. However, I am restoring the notability tag since this discussion was not resolved (merely deleted). Please add your comments here as to why the Columbia City Paper meets Wikipedia:Notability. - PennySpender1983 (talk) 23:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Columbia City Paper. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:24, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Columbia City Paper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SC wikiproject importance[edit]

Importance for the SC project has been set to mid to indicate that the references on this article need to be sorted out when possible. Muttnick (talk) 02:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Columbia_City_Paper&oldid=1206753980"