Talk:Codeberg

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 17 January 2024 by reviewer Acebulf (talk · contribs).

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Upload Logo[edit]

would be nice if somebody with the right to do so, could upload the logo. (as per ref)

https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Design/src/branch/main/logo/icon/svg/codeberg-logo_icon_blue.svg No-bot-whatsoever (talk) 13:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the repository link you shared, there is another folder with the license for Codeberg's logo. The Codeberg logo has a Creative Commons 0 license (which is equivalent to the public domain), so anyone is free to upload it to Wikimedia.

This upload to Wikimedia is valid and can be used for this Codeberg Wikipedia page. Koppleganger (talk) 20:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate from Codeberg e.V[edit]

The Gitea page talks only about the product, here we mention it as both a platform in the main section and as an organisation in the infobox, it probably should be one of those, I assume the intention was to describe the platform. Tranzystorek-io (talk) 12:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article is primarily about the platform, but I don't believe it's possible to discuss it without also covering Codeberg e.V. I think the article as it is strikes a good balance. If you check out the articles for platforms like GitHub and GitLab you'll find they're more focused on the relevant entities than this article is. SkipperGeek (talk) 12:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback, I have edited this Codeberg draft and reorganized to match a similar Wikipedia article GitHub, which has sections for GitHub, Inc. (an organization) and GitHub.com (a website). I also added clarifying language to all references to distinguish between Codeberg e.V. (the organization) and Codeberg.org (the website).

Please review and let me know if this resolves the issue. Koppleganger (talk) 21:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for late response, I believe this resolves the discussion. Tranzystorek-io (talk) 17:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI notice[edit]

At an early stage in the creation of this draft somebody added a COI notice. I believe the article as written is entirely factual and has a neutral point of view. However, although I am not closely affiliated with Codeberg I am a donor, so I would prefer if somebody else could review and decide whether it is appropriate at this point to remove the template. (edit: For clarity: I did not create this draft, but I have contributed to it.) SkipperGeek (talk) 12:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the article and added a few edits. I also think it is written in a neutral manner.

Please review and let me know if the COI concerns have been resolved. Koppleganger (talk) 21:36, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have also assessed that the article is neutral in tone and doesn't seem to be problematic in that regard. Being a donator to a cause is very weak as far as COIs go. Acebulf ^{(talk | contribs)} 07:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Codeberg.org reception citations[edit]

The second paragraph in the Reception section cites articles that supposedly indicate visibility increase and project migrations that happened "as a result" of the June 2022 "Give Up Github" campaign, but the following are not logically consistent with that statement:

https://www.ubuntubuzz.com/2020/06/an-adventure-in-codebergorg-review-by-a-non-programmer.html - this is just the citation from the first paragraph repeated, and it hails from 2020
https://peppermintos.com/2022/09/one-year-since-we-moved-to-codeberg-org/ - the actual migration is reported to have happened in 2021
https://blog.freeyourgadget.org/release-0_40_0.html - the article and migration are from 2019

These are still probably valid proofs for Codeberg popularity, but should be separated factually from the anti-github campaign. Tranzystorek-io (talk) 18:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]