Talk:Clinical cardiac electrophysiology

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I[edit]

I am doing an electrophysiology fellowship and wanted to contribute this little blurb. How do I give proper credit to the author of the "cardiac electrophysiology" article?

Merge[edit]

Actually, I think these two articles should be merged. Ksheka 19:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it'd be better to have an intro article Cardiac electrophysiolgy (linked from Cardiology and Electrophysiolgy articles) briefly explaining what science it is and what branches it has and 2 comprehensive articles Basic/Experimental cardiac electrophysiolgy and Clinical cardiac electrophysiology. What do you say?Armatura (talk) 11:04, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the merge tags as no consensus to merge was formed. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The other article in question is electrophysiology. While I generally agree that the two should not be merged, they clearly aren't well coordinated. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 14:38, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the other article appears to be Cardiac electrophysiology, which does seem to me to have significant overlap. Again, at minimum these (three, now) articles need to be well organized with respect to each other, including distinguishing among themselves. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 14:41, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]