Talk:Clayton Colvin

Unintelligible comment

We read:

Colvin claims to speak in a language all his own. Lingual complexities give way to a universal knowledge hidden away in the fabric of his work. Contour here lies in the fact that as a society we are sometimes grouped and categorized by hard-edge lines, but fundamentally we are very much the same. -Jon Coffelt

Does this mean anything, and if so, what? -- Hoary 15:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

This must be in relation to the exhibition he was in Maybe what should be included with the curators name is what it is in reference to. Says this in a curatorial statement on Schedler Minchin Gallery website ..... added on 13 Dec 06 by 68.167.67.136

Thanks for the start at identifying this (which is necessary if it's to be included), but I still don't understand the meanings of:

• as a society we are sometimes grouped and categorized by hard-edge lines, but fundamentally we are very much the same (let's call this [A])
• Contour here lies in the fact that [A]
• Lingual complexities (let's call this [B])
• a universal knowledge (let's call this [C])
• [B] give way to [C] hidden away in the fabric of his work.
• Whether what follows the first sentence is (a) what Coffelt thinks about Colvin's work or (b) what Coffelt thinks that Colvin claims about Colvin's work. (If (a), why the first sentence? If (b), why not quote Colvin directly?)

Other people may well understand this better than I do, but I have trouble believing that anybody finds it very lucid. If people don't find it lucid, I don't understand why it's worth quoting. But I'm willing to be persuaded. -- Hoary 02:26, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Still no explanation forthcoming, so I'm about to delete it. Hoary 23:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Clayton Colvin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222033648/http://www.activeculture.info/eventsDetails.asp?ItemID=14863 to http://www.activeculture.info/eventsDetails.asp?ItemID=14863
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061023003008/http://www.magiccityart.com/artists/index.cfm?fuseaction=content&id=28 to http://www.magiccityart.com/artists/index.cfm?fuseaction=content&id=28
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140223131848/http://brianbishop.com/artwork/2659098_Taming_the_Uncontrollable_on_Clayton.html to http://brianbishop.com/artwork/2659098_Taming_the_Uncontrollable_on_Clayton.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)