Talk:ClariS

ClariS received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

ClariS has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 1, 2018. (Reviewed version).

A fact from ClariS appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 February 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Japanese pop music female duo ClariS have not released photos of themselves to the public, and instead have employed illustrators to draw their likenesses?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/February.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 00:58, May 4, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WP:Japan Assessment Commentary[edit]

The article was assessed B-class, but narrowly. The information about their names as pseudonyms needs to be included in the Lead section. I'm a little surprised there's not even information on their birthdays. What is the stated need for anonymity? Age & high school? It all sounds pretty manufactured, but I suppose that speculation even from a "reliable source" would be inadmissible. Still, it would be impossible for two high school girls to attend a regular school, where they would be expected to attend club activities, and carry on a career to the extent this groups has. Last, most articles on musical groups include a section on "Critical reception". This article mentions chart rating and gold album, from which one can infer their popularity, but the article would benefit from critical quotes on style, sound, etc. Good luck. Boneyard90 (talk) 12:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:ClariS/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 20:58, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and

it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

- I would argue that the lead should expanded to at least two paragraphs based on the body's size.
Verifiable with no original research:
all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
- There are some sentences like ""True Blue" is a cover of Zone's 2003 single." and "ClariS released their fourth studio album Fairy Castle on January 25, 2017." that need referencing.
Broad in its coverage:

it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

- Is the second image that important? I fail to see it's importance because the illustrator does not have his own article.

Other than that, I feel ClariS is in good shape to become a GA. I'll gladly pass it once these issues are solved.Tintor2 (talk) 20:58, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply, but I suppose the second image is important, as it illustrates the time when ClariS' members consisted of Clara and Alice, as opposed to the current lineup of Clara and Karen. I'll try to address the other issues within the next few days. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 06:53, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Narutolovehinata5: Don't worry but remember to ping or mention me in case I don't see the reply in the watchlist.Tintor2 (talk) 23:37, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've now sourced the two unsourced statements, and expanded the lead to include mentions of their live performances and their not showing their faces in public (arguably their trademark). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Narutolovehinata5: Passing the article. Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 15:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10th anniversary[edit]

I'd likely base this claim on obviousness, but the group's been there for 10 years; and thinking of members focusing on their high school studies as a reason of their choice of anonymity doesn't make sense these days. So I removed that claim on my recent update of this article... DJ Baguio (talk) 01:21, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like someone revised my recent contribution and used a more reliable reference. But the format is still the same, still excluding the claim of "high school duties make them decide their anonymity"... DJ Baguio (talk) 01:28, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]