Talk:Citizens United v. FEC/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Citizens United v. FEC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Updates to Opinion Polls

There have been opinion polls conducted much more recently than the one included in the article. For instance there was an Ipsos poll conducted in August of 2017 (link here: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/center-for-public-integrity-2017-08-31) which found that 48% of Americans opposed the decision and 30% were in favor. I think this poll should certainly be added, but I would like other people's opinions on whether we should keep the old poll data. Is it really relevant to include poll data which is nearly 10 years old in the article?

Thanks, DiscoStu42 (talk) 04:35, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Broken Link leading to 404 error

Currently, the 10th citation leads to a 404 error and is not functional. ( Carney, Eliza (2010-01-21). "Court Unlikely To Stop With Citizens United". National Journal. Retrieved 2010-01-21.) https://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/rg_20100121_2456.php

Sorry if I made any mistakes. I didn't have much time to look up the etiquette or sign up. 76.14.115.35 (talk) 20:25, 6 August 2018 (UTC) Philip M

Old Poll Data

Is there a reason that this article contains so much outdated polling? Many of the polls included are nearly 10 years old. If nobody objects, I will remove some of the older polling. DiscoStu42 (talk) 07:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Citizens_United_v._FEC/Archive_2&oldid=1175165268"