Talk:Chittagong/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dongar Kathorekar (talk · contribs) 19:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1st comment[edit]

The etymology and history section have each one citation required template for asserted statement. The Culture section and Sports section require more citations.

Attention nominator

@Ibrahim Husain Meraj: you have nominated this article for GA. You have made 11 edits to this article which is just 0.35% of edits made in this article. Your largest edit has been to fill up references using a semi-automatic tool. According to Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions, "Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article prior to a nomination." Have you done this? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:51, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am closing this GA review as a fail, because the reviewer did not conduct a proper GA review, and per the issues pointed out by Dharmadhyaksha. sst ✈ 16:13, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]