Talk:Chigwell School

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Essex task force.

Schools Mid‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled][edit]

Good start - more than a stub ... Victuallers 16:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Upped to Mid as alumni list impressive. Victuallers 14:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The exam results section has been removed as it has been subjected persistent vandalism. The information can be found in newspapers and newspaper websites. Harsnett1629 15:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Davis[edit]

Should we not include Anthony Davis in the list of notable Chigwellians. He attended from 1991-2002. He has recently been in many major news sources.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/essex/8615732.stm Thaimanwilson (talk) 23:11, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No. Unless there are other sources that make him notable, he appears only to be mentioned in relation to one event, and our relevant guideline on this is WP:BLP1E. Minor criminals don't get included on that basis. And to be included in this article, he would at least have to be eligible to have an article in his own right, and so far, I don't see that barrier having been climbed. Rodhull andemu 23:22, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dates and Stott[edit]

I removed this undoubtedly good-faith edit in the lead from 2008, just after where it gives the 1629 date: "(even though G. Stott suggests it was more likely founded around 1620-3)". We would need to know who Stott was, and quote the (presumably reliable) source; additionally it would need rewording a bit, as the "even though" sounds rather argumentative and actually there isn't really such a contradiction between the two ... if this were to go back in it would be nice if it was in a more integrated form. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 09:58, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chigwell School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927075653/http://www.chigwell-school.com/alumni/archives/index.html to http://www.chigwell-school.com/alumni/archives/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]