Talk:Chicken Invaders

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 January 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Rewired (demoparty) (0 participants)
Grossology (books) (2 participants)
Studio Yotta (1 participant)
Vicious Engine (3 participants)
Jack Marston (Red Dead) (6 participants)
Joshua Tomar (6 participants)
Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants)
Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Headings[edit]

Shouldn't it be "Software/Hardware requirements" instead of "Software requirements"? --Madmax.ptz 17:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - I have changed it to System requirements. Bridgeplayer 21:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Save the Article[edit]

I have added a 'reception' bit with 2 other INDEPENDANT sources. If this is not what wikipedia needs please tell me precisely what you need. I'll try and get it. Ikabu 02:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It needs multiple (IE two) independent reliable sources (IE reviews or articles discussing the subject). Since this is a download-game, reviews would be the most likely good sources. The Gamespot review is one example, another link somewhere along those lines is what's needed. Download sites like Download.com, GameHippo, VNUnet etc. are not reliable sources. If you find anything can I suggest you follow the link to the AFD page and provide it there (that's where the discussion is actually taking place). QuagmireDog 19:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, QuagmireDog, I'll get to work!

Ikabu 02:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome, and since the article has been kept it's here for further improvement in the future. QuagmireDog 17:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I forgot all about this Article/AFD. If anyone has any more references that need fixing, I'd be happy to help, as I did with the existing ones. I hate good articles going to waste (AfD). Shrumster 15:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox needed[edit]

Requesting an infobox for the article --Jack Zhang (talk) 12:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added new sections for the two games[edit]

CrazyWare, here. I've made a dozen 'cosmetic changes' to this old article and included 2 games in there: both the first game and the 5th one. I'm wondering why nobody else did this, but first come, first serve, I guess. And...nobody's commented here in like 7 years! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrazyWare (talk • contribs) 10:02, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is it okay if I add pictures to this article?[edit]

Is it okay if I add pictures to this article? Since Wikipedia keeps deleting pictures I put in this article, I'm assuming I can't. But, this IS a good faith edit, so this is beneficial. --CrazyWare (talk) 23:12, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've added back the deleted "Reception" section[edit]

Since the section for the game reviews were deleted for some reason, I found them in this page's history and added them back, making a few revisions. Please don't delete this again.--CrazyWare (talk) 22:39, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plot/Citations: cosmetic fixes needed[edit]

Still working on fixing this one up: the excessively detailed non-cited plots are funny, yeah, but they don't need to be in the article. Going to fix these citations a bit. Nerdwiththehat^Talk 16:46, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop deleting the "Talk" page.[edit]

So someone keeps removing this article's "Talk" page, for some reason. Their reason was that the content was "off topic" and "non-answerable", neither of which made sense. Every single article has a page like this for discussing edits and it therefore should not be deleted. Please don't delete the page, again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.17.14 (talk) 12:29, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chicken Invaders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930191907/http://uk.gamespot.com/pc/action/chickeninvadersthenextwave/review.html?sid=6158734 to http://uk.gamespot.com/pc/action/chickeninvadersthenextwave/review.html?sid=6158734

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]