Talk:Chemical fouling inhibitors

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sanitation Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Please take note that the owners of trademarks HELAMIN and FINEAMIN are competitors. Ammpat (talk) 09:43, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From my point of view, this is advertisement for a single product or manufacturer. There are many other chemicals available from different manufacturers for the conditioning of boiler and cooling water.

Till today the HELAMIN Group is splitted. To get clean Information go to EPRI /USA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.133.121.169 (talk) 16:30, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of Fineamin[edit]

We have two articles on what appear to be two commercial brandnames for products that are similar or identical, used for the same process of boiler feedwater treatment. Notability for these individuals is unclear (as brands), although the product type in general is. Each article cites the same single source for general principles, a source that cites Helamin as an exemplar of the type. The Fineamin article was created later, as an almost verbatim copy of Helamin. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:40, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merging one brand into another doesn't seem to be a good idea as it would mean listing one of the products as under the heading of a competitor. Perhaps it would be better, therefore, to merge both to a new neutral page, Chemical fouling inhibitors. Alternatively, merge to Fouling#Fouling control, although that page is already large and additional content would make it unwieldy. Klbrain (talk) 00:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]