Talk:Charlotte David

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women's History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Page name: "Charlotte David"?[edit]

WP:TITLE has the following:

Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources

"Charlotte David" seems to be, by far, the most common way that she's referred to in sources. A good parallel would be Empress Joséphine, which likewise uses a name that she acquired partway through life and yet is the most likely one by which she would be recognised. I suggest that the page title should be changed to match, keeping the two names in the lead as they currently are.

Does anybody have any thoughts? UndercoverClassicist (talk) 09:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing none, I'll make the move. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 13:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]