Talk:Charles C. Deam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Charles C. Deam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Houston, we have a problem. The BSU cite claims that the Board of Forestry was created in 1909, then the Traces of Indiana cite says that the Board created Clark State Forest in 1903. I will attempt to fix.GXIndiana (talk) 14:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BSU source[edit]

@GXIndiana: I'm not claiming that you are right or wrong, but how have you determined that the BSU source you removed is incorrect? -- Fyrael (talk) 15:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I now see your message above (FYI it's a very good idea to create a new section when you want to start a new discussion), so that explains why one date is questionable, but it's still not clear how you've concluded that the source is full of errors. -- Fyrael (talk) 15:09, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@GXIndiana: you are continuing to remove references to this, but have not clarified why you believe the source is wrong. Please respond here. Also, as a side note, including the 4 tildes in your edit summaries does not do anything. That's just for the end of your text on talk pages. -- Fyrael (talk) 21:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]