Talk:Chapman Guitars

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chapman Guitars article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 May 2010. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Guitarists: Equipment

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guitarists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guitarists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuitaristsWikipedia:WikiProject GuitaristsTemplate:WikiProject Guitaristsguitarist articles
	This article is supported by Guitar equipment task force.

Musical Instruments Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

indirect advertisement of online guitar shop.[edit]

Hello,

I wanted to start a small discussion concerning the line of the article below.

"However, now the production has grown up consistently, as you can see visiting Andertons website."

Providing also a link for the store. I am new in Wikipedia editing so I would like to ask whether you believe that this should be deleted or changed somehow.

Sorry if this is too obvious for some people but I am not familiar with these concepts.

New edit: Now the page has been renewed excluding the indirect advertisement. Thanks to the contributor.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sopapado (talk • contribs) 08:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

totally agree. I actually like their guitars, but this wiki page is so fucking blatantly an advertisment edited by one of their people. kinda embarrassing for them. Δ (talk) 11:11, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This site still looks like one big advert/catalogue, and provides no information regarding the "scandal" in the US, or any useful dates/info for models, just a useless list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.136.22.154 (talk) 08:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As of September 2023 this article still reads like an advertisement from way back, when Chapman guitars started. 84.147.93.233 (talk) 21:17, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]