Talk:Cervical dislocation

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veterinary medicine Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Painless?[edit]

Why is this method of killing assumed to be painless? Is there any evidence that it is? 71.255.164.43 (talk) 20:32, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy[edit]

Speedy delete is contested. Work in progress and I object to this this edit which add a template for speedy deletion. --FR Soliloquy 04:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not appreciate the templating by user:Resolute in this instance as I continue to work on the page. --FR Soliloquy 04:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. That does not change the fact that this is an empty article. Typically, when one creates a stub, or a starting point, they do so by establishing what the topic is with a couple sentences. As it stands, this article lacks context, an explanation of why this topic is notable, and really, everything that makes an encyclopedia article. In the time you spent complaining about my tag, you could have added this context, afterwhich, I would cheerfully remove the speedy tag if the topic appears to meet Wikipedia's policies. Resolute 04:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Thank you for the pin-pointers. --FR Soliloquy 05:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cervical dislocation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Killing instructions?[edit]

Done

It is quite sickening and totally inappropriate that the killing process is given in the form of instructions. Illang (talk) 06:01, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Illang (talk) 06:01, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]