Talk:Category 2 cable

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move[edit]

Category 2 cable → Level 2 cable — Category 2 cable is not a the correct term. The correct term is level 2 cable and I think it is Important use the correct term. — Crazz bug 5 (talk) 21:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Oppose - The single cited reference indicates, contrary to the article text, that Cat 2 is a legit term. The UTP Cable Standards template also seems to consider Cat 2 to be a legit term. --Kvng (talk) 14:36, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments: