Talk:Cartier Building

Cartier Building has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 9, 2021. (Reviewed version).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Cartier Building appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Cartier Building in New York City was purchased in exchange for $100 and a necklace?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cartier Building.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Cartier New York

... that Morton Freeman Plant sold his house (pictured) to jeweler Cartier for $100 and a necklace? Source: Dunlap, David W. (April 26, 2000). "Commercial Real Estate; Cartier Spruces Up to Show Off Its Jewels in Style". The New York Times
- ALT1:... that the Cartier Building (pictured) in New York City was purchased in exchange for $100 and a necklace? Source: Dunlap, David W. (April 26, 2000). "Commercial Real Estate; Cartier Spruces Up to Show Off Its Jewels in Style". The New York Times
- ALT2:... that when the Cartier Building (pictured) was designated as a New York City landmark, Cartier officials threw a party, only for the landmark status to be later revoked? Source: "'Landmark' Label At Cartier Building Fought by Owner" (PDF). The New York Times. July 28, 1967. p. 20.; "Harlem Courthouse And 3 Sites Here Named Landmarks" (PDF). The New York Times. August 17, 1967. p. 42.
- ALT3:... that the Cartier Building (pictured), purchased for $100 and a necklace in 1916, was described a century later as a "thing of rational and distinctly Gallic beauty"? Source: Dunlap 2000; Trebay, Guy (September 3, 2016). "Renovation Restores the Luster to Cartier Flagship". The New York Times.

Reviewed: Charlie Wheatley
Comment: more hooks pending

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 18:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]

5x expansion confirmed. Like hook 1 best. length of hook satisfactory. Article in excellent shape. DavidCane (talk) 23:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cartier Building/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

Move "Use mdy dates" below the hatnote.
Add alt text to every image being used.
"on the site to designs" - reword
"making an agreement" → "agreeing"
"become the his house" → "become his house"
"in 4 East 52nd Street" → "at 4 East 52nd Street"
Wikilink The New York Times.

Progress[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks. I have done all of these now. Epicgenius (talk) 05:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]