Talk:Candy (Baekhyun song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Ashleyyoursmile (talk). Self-nominated at 10:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The hook is not interesting to me. Surely, the lyrics for a song titled "Candy" should contain references to candy and not references to automobiles. Sorry. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 12:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have to agree. I personally don't find the hook very interesting. What else would a song called "Candy" reference? — Yours, Berrely • TalkContribs 12:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I thought the hook was kind of interesting, although the original hook could be revised a bit: perhaps mentioning the "Baekhyun compares his charms" part more explicitly might improve it? I tried looking for alternative hook facts in the article but none seemed to be suitable. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:06, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT1: ... that Baekhyun compares his charms to various flavors of candy in his song "Candy"?
@Narutolovehinata5: Thank you for your suggestion, came up with ALT1. Jeromi Mikhael, Berrely, Is this going to work? Ashleyyoursmile! 09:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ashleyyoursmile:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: That's better. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 09:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]