Talk:Campervan

The mention of the Roadtrek would be improved by a picture, but there isn't one on the commons and I don't have one. Anyone care to upload? User:Dickpenn|Dickpenn]] 18:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Someone might want to talk about what 'Class B' is supposed to mean... 95.209.45.109 (talk) 17:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

User Special:Contributions/91.182.185.211 has proposed that the RV article be merged with this article, but has not advanced any reasons. I am opposed to the merge, but will await the proposer's reasons before elaborating.Downsize43 (talk) 07:00, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: I am opposed to this merger, campervan should have its own article. South Bay (talk) 00:44, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Clearly two separate types of vehicles, though I would support expansions of both articles to make this distinction clearer. -- RoninBK _{T C} 20:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: For the reasons given above. ♦ Jongleur¹⁰⁰ ♦ ^talk 21:03, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because it's not just the name that differs, but all the subsidiary terminology and it's pretty well explained at present. – Kieran T ^(talk) 22:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amenities?[edit]

in the amenities section, one of them just says Microwave. isn't that supposed to be a Microwave oven? --Peacock486 (talk) 21:40, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another merge proposal[edit]

I propose that campervan and motorhome be merged together. Is there a difference between them? Jll (talk) 17:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: I oppose the merging of campervan and motorhome; there are distinct differences between them, see http://www.campervan-adventures.com/campervans/index.htm J.taylor899 (talk) 15:50, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It does seem that they are indeed different. I'll withdraw my proposal. Jll (talk) 15:35, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]