Talk:CRIME

Computer Security: Computing High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

White paper[edit]

Is the white paper published yet? I can't find it in the Ekoparty website or on Juliano's twitter feed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.66.52.86 (talk) 00:42, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives relevant?[edit]

I added the paragraph about BREACH as an advancement of CRIME, as relevant. User:Thompor took issue with that and deleted the lot with the terse edit summary "improved", which was later reverted. What do others think about mentioning derivatives of CRIME? --Lexein (talk) 07:49, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed para[edit]

CRIME may also be defeated on the client side by placing restrictions on cross-site requests, known as cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection. The "CsFire" extension for Mozilla Firefox strips authentication and cookies from cross-site requests, while the "RequestPolicy" extension completely blocks cross-site requests by default. However, these extensions interfere with the normal operation of many websites, so the user must set up and maintain whitelists of unrestricted requests.^[1]

^ Ristic, Ivan (August 7, 2013). "Defending against the BREACH Attack". Qualys. Retrieved August 12, 2013.

CRIME is generic (and different) attack, this only helps with BREACH.
It mitigates the attack, doesn't defeat it. The strength of the attack is in controlling (or knowing) the downloaded cleartext, not necessarily in the method used
"BREACH is a category of vulnerabilities"
it requires that the attacked system "Reflect a secret (such as a CSRF token) in HTTP response bodies" i.e. CSRF is only one secret type that can be revealed.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:BREACH (security exploit) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:33, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Ristic, Ivan (August 7, 2013). "Defending against the BREACH Attack". Qualys. Retrieved August 12, 2013.

[1]