Talk:CFD Mountain View

Military history: Canadian / North America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force

Merger proposal[edit]

Page should be merged with CFB Trenton. There is no such installation in the Canadian Forces termed "CFD" (Canadian Forces Detachment). Mountain View is administratively and operationally part of CFB Trenton. Palaeozoic99 (talk) 00:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The term CFD exists in the CF system. If you were a member of the CF and on the DWAN you would be able to look it up yourself. Ng.j (talk) 00:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link for you: http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/v2/nr-sp/index-eng.asp?id=2866 Ng.j (talk) 00:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree - the facility is currently administratively part of CFB Trenton, but that alone is no reason to merge it. Mountain View has a long history of its own, more of which should be added to this article, particularly with regard to No. 6 Bombing and Gunnery School (6 B&GS). - Ahunt (talk) 12:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If not merged, then the name should be changed. There is no such facility as (CFD) Canadian Forces Detachment. The Canadian Forces only has (CFB) Canadian Forces Base and (CFS) Canadian Forces Station. Palaeozoic99 (talk) 21:03, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well apparently you haven't waited the normal seven days for this merger debate to run its normal course and have moved it without discussion. This article has been here since May 2006, why the rush? - Ahunt (talk) 21:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Closed, merger failed due to lack of consensus.Ng.j (talk) 00:51, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CFD Mountain View. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]