Talk:Breath (novel)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Breath (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 08:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Woman-boy Statutory Rape[edit]

Corrected the female sex offender denial/apologetics (see https://www.amazon.com/Perspectives-Female-Sex-Offending-Culture/dp/1138250007) by correctly characterizing Eva's statory rapes of Pikelet and by removing the ridiculous notion that her rape of Pikelet was part of an affair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.235.9.45 (talk) 00:47, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quite clearly both the novel and the film depict repeated woman-boy statutory rape and NOT an 'affair' or a sexual 'relationship' based on Aussie law below:

Australian Capital Territory It is an offence in the Australian Capital Territory to have sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 16.[4] However, it is a defence if the younger party was aged 10 years or older and the offender was not more than 2 years older than the younger party.[5] It is also an offence to have sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 18 if that person is under the care of the offender (guardian, teacher etc.).[6] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.73.23.171 (talk) 00:56, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At least in the film, Bruce Pike is a quite willing participant with prior attraction to Eva Sanderson, so I think the phrasing makes it look worse than what is actually described. It's still pretty bad on many levels, though. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 11:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]