Talk:Box Hill railway station, Melbourne

Australia: Melbourne / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Box Hill railway station, Melbourne is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	April 10, 2013

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

This article lacks references.

Merge[edit]

The reason behind the merge is that the bus terminal, while major, is still pretty much part of the associated railway station and is not standalone. Thoughts? Wongm (talk) 04:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only non-MURL station to be underground[edit]

Just wondering whether it's just me, or whether the line referring to Box Hill as the only non city loop station to be underground still has any relevance?

With the completion of grade seperation projects at Gardiner, Nunawading; and soon to be completed at Ormond, McKinnion and Bentleigh, it has to be argued whether Box Hill can still be described as the only non loop station underground.

I also note Kogarah railway station on the Sydney Illawarra Line, which like Box Hill has a building built over it (in this case the station concourse and part of a shopping centre), is not described as underground - but merely "built over".

Just after some other opinions? -- sandgemADDICT ^yeah? 00:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Box Hill railway station, Melbourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140426090544/http://ptv.vic.gov.au/route/view/7458 to http://ptv.vic.gov.au/route/view/7458

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]