Talk:Blank Page

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBlank Page has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starBlank Page is part of the Lotus (Christina Aguilera album) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 23, 2013Good article nomineeListed
February 22, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 9, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that according to Michael Gallucci for PopCrush, the Christina Aguilera song "Blank Page" is a "show-stopper" and a "classic vocal performance"?
Current status: Good article

Reviews[edit]

AARON• TALK 14:27, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Blank Page/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: HĐ (talk · contribs) 03:30, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

  • It is a minimalist piano driven ballad; it received frequent comparisons to Aguilera's 2002 single "Beautiful", but received one negative comparison to Adele's song "Someone Like You", for sounding too similar vocally, lyrically and musically. ---> "Blank Page" is a minimalist piano-driven ballad which received frequent comparisons to Aguilera's 2002 single "Beautiful". However, the song received one negative comparison to Adele's song "Someone Like You" for sounding to similar vocally, lyrically and musically.
  • The song garnered strong critical acclaim from music critics. It was praised for it its simplistic arrangement and Aguilera's raw and strong vocal performance was complimented. ---> It garnered strong critical acclaim from music critics, who praised its simplistic arrangement as well as Aguilera's raw and strong vocal performance on the song.
  • The song peaked at number 53 on the South Korea international singles chart following the release of Lotus. ---> Upon the release of Lotus, "Blank Page" peaked at number 53...

Background and recording[edit]

  • No issues found

Development[edit]

  • "Blank Page" is the third album in which Aguilera and Furler have collaborated on material together for. ---> Album?
  • Later that year, they reunited to create a song to be included on the Burlesque soundtrack, a song called "Bound to You" ---> Later that year, they reunited to create a song to be included on the Burlesque soundtrack, which was called "Bound to You"
  • Aguilera was interview by Billboard when she attended the Billboard Film & TV Music Conference, Aguilera revealed that she views "Blank Page" as a more "vulnerable" version of her 2002 song, "Beautiful" ---> Aguilera was interviewed by Billboard when she attended the Billboard Film & TV Conference. There, Aguilera revealed...

Composition[edit]

  • No issues found

Critical reception[edit]

  • Mesfin Fekadu for The Huffington Post concurred with Hampp in the respect that she also thought that "Blank Page" was reminiscent of the songs co-written by Furler on Bionic, which she also described "that album's highlight". Fekadu further described the song as a "standout" ---> Remove the latter

Live performance, credits, charts[edit]

  • Nothing found

Refs[edit]

  • Ref 1 needs Billboard and Prometheus Global Media linked
  • Ref 3 unlink Billboard and Prometheus Global Media
  • Ref 16 : Allmusic doesn't need to be inclined
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 7 September 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: withdraw per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


– I am not convinced that WP:DIFFCAPS is sufficient disambiguation and that the song is the primary topic of "blank page". sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blank Page. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blank Page. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Blank_Page&oldid=1206331822"