Talk:Black Guerrilla Family

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 April 2019 and 7 June 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): IamCorleone34.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Book cover, Soledad Brother by George Jackson.jpg[edit]

Image:Book cover, Soledad Brother by George Jackson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Black Guerilla Family Pirus[edit]

i have heard that most of the black guerrilla family memebers upon relese have become under the pirus in los angles due to the on going war with the mexican mafia.the black guerrillas territory is only in prison but once released most members joined under the pirus street gang being called black guerrilla famaliy pirus who help along the pirus and the bloods fight the mexican mafia.it is un clear that because of this if there has been any beef from allies the crips who are also allies to the black guerrilla famaliy but also fight the mexican mafiain los angles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthizz69 (talkcontribs) 15:34, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New up to date info[edit]

I suggest we try and find things about that's up to date —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.173.73 (talk) 08:04, 22 May 2010 (UTC) It is incorrect to state that many members of the BGF join the Pirus upon relase from prison.The BGf is a political/military entity which recruits from all groups necessary to carry forty its objective,Many of the Pirus/Crips that has joined the rank & file fall back to the vice of their original gangs due to lack of discipline or committment,& often times use the name & rep of the BGF to futher their interest —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.55.248 (talk) 22:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy and Goals[edit]

I cleaned up that section a little--creating full sentences and such. I don't know how accurate it is, so I didn't actually change anything except to eliminate one clearly irrelevant statement.Biasedbulldog (talk) 16:22, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the BGF current philosophy and goals of Blakc power, Black Nationalism, Black Liberation removed Tim Wilson 210 (talk) 00:35, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is poorly sourced - the referenced Baltimore Sun article doesn't mention any of this. If you are using the Black Book as a reference, you must credit as the source, and you must be careful in using a primary source like that, since the edits you and another account have been inserting have carried a non-neutral point of view. Acroterion (talk) 00:56, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ismaaiyl Brinsley[edit]

News media accounts of today's double murder of two NYPD police officers claim that the shooter was a member of the BGF. Early accounts are often wrong but it's worth setting up a placeholder in talk for updating the article: http://www.nydailynews.com/cops-shot-brooklyn-sources-article-1.2051941?evdb http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/20/ismaaiyl-brinsley-nypd-black-guerilla-family_n_6361324.html www.infowars.com/nypd-declares-wartime-after-suspected-marxist-black-guerrilla-family-member-executes-cops/ infowars.com is fringe, does not meet our sourcing guidelines and should not be used

TMLutas (talk) 06:47, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This whole piece needs major editing[edit]

The use of 'gang" when referring to the original BGF founded by George Jackson while incarcerated rather than inmate organization, is part of a theme promoted by corrections officials - the fact that there may be other groups in prisons across the US who have taken up that name (similar to the "New" Black Panther Party, which is not related to the original) should not be a rationale for defining what was formed then, as what is now. Particularly because with lurid press coverage of the recent shooting of two NYC police by a deranged man who shot his girlfriend, killed two police and then himself has nothing to do with George Jackson, Geronimo Pratt etc.

I worked with the legal defense team for the Soledad Brothers, and the San Quentin Six, corresponded with them, and find some of the sources here highly questionable.

DeeOlive (talk) 09:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Oliver, I have mentioned your concerns in Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Black Guerrilla Family. - Location (talk) 18:08, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure The usual practice is to use the language of the sources cited. If the sources are troublesome then list the source here, say why it should not be used and what would fix the problem.
Note that while personal experience is useful, for quality control, Wikipedia only covers what has been published. For information to be added, it must be followed with a citation to a published source. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Black Guerrilla Family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black Guerrilla Family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]